Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

Front of Newcastle Elementary School

Maple Hills Elementary School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for Elementary School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS).  For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a

Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning.   ISD Priority 1

Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b

Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in  a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy

Training

  • All staff will participate in ISD district training
  • All teaching staff will meet on a determined schedule with the school implementation specialist
  • Training parents through a literacy event in the fall to learn about Benchmark Advance and how they can support literacy at home

Teaming

Recommendation: describe how and how often teams commit to discuss Benchmark Advance assessment data and implications for implementation centered on the following questions:

  1. What do we want all students to know and be able to do?
  2. How do we know if they learn it?
  3. How are we responding when some students do not learn it?
  4. How do we extend learning when students demonstrate mastery?

Integrity of Delivery

  • Use of implementation goals provided by Benchmark / Teaching & Learning Services
  • Collaboration in planning the literacy blocks

Resources Allocation

  • Implementation specialist (district)
  • Dedicated staff meeting time to training & collaboration
  • Commitment of team meeting time

Intended Impacts

  • Increase in reading decoding, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension
  • Increase in proficiency with grammar, writing structure, and effective communication of ideas in writing
  • Acceleration of achievement in key gap areas including phonics, overall reading, written expression

Key Data

  • i-Ready Phonics & Overall Reading
  • Achievement of stretch growth goals / accelerated growth for students scoring below standard in fall/prior spring.
  • Maintaining proficiency for students scoring at standard (level 3) in fall/prior spring.
  • Progress as monitored through embedded assessments:
    • Benchmark Performance Tasks
    • Benchmark week 2 assessments for each unit
    • RFS Assessments and Title/LAP progress monitoring

Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

Mobilize and Equip Teacher Leaders

  • Six Newcastle teachers joined the district Ignite Team in preparation for expanding their own understanding of UDL practices, implementing those practices, and supporting other colleagues in this process
  • Newcastle Ignite teachers are participating in district training and providing professional development and ongoing support and check-ins for all of our instructional staff
  • Ignite teachers are opening up their classrooms as models available for teachers from across the district to visit

Training of All Instructional Staff

  • Our Ignite team is providing professional development and ongoing support and check-ins for all staff
  • Teachers are encouraged to visit model classrooms in our building and throughout the district
  • A half-day of planning/release time is being provided to each grade-level team
  • Building PDs will continue to focus on UDL principles and practices
  • Building PD will incorporate ongoing support of our Ignite team leads, leading conversations and providing for support for teachers focusing on their specific UDL goals while reviewing data and implementation

Implementation Support

  • We began this implementation by providing volunteers the opportunity to meet with our district TOSA and principal to discuss a UDL problem of practice and brainstorm strategies and next steps. This was supported through use of a substitute to cover in each of these teachers’ classrooms while they met over multiple sessions to track and celebrate progress.
  • Our volunteers then were provided time to meet with a second round of interested teachers to support them in the same way that they had been supported by our TOSA and principal 

Additional Resources

  • Our intention is to create a bank of videos that capture glimpses into classrooms that capture embedded UDL principles in practice
  • Provide staff the opportunity to utilize a self-reflection tool that analyzes shifts in use of instructional time away from teacher focused/talking to student autonomy/sharing
  • Access to a Sustaining Effort & Persistence Padlet designed to support UDL goals set by individual teachers.
     

Intended Impacts

  • Increased student engagement (particularly related to inclusive practices)
  • Newcomer ML students comfortable engaging in class and accessing content
  • Increased student agency (taking control of their own learning, choice making, goal setting, and strategies for demonstrating thinking and learning
  • Increased sense of community

Key Data

  • WIDA (looking at listening and speaking for impact)
  • Student responses on ISD Soft Skills Surveys
  • SAEBRS responses regarding a sense of belonging
  • Increase in academic performance on i-Ready and SBA
  • Decrease in teacher-led conversations coupled with increase in student-led conversations
     

Inclusionary Practices

Access Support for LRC 1/2 Teacher, Gen Ed Teachers, and Paraprofessionals

  • LRC 1 /2 teacher Collaborating with district peers
  • Training with district BSBA/consultant
  • Consulting with LRC2 teachers and administrative support
  • Weekly team meetings with kinder team and paraprofessionals
  • Coaching of kinder team and paraprofessionals by special services TOSA

Focus on LRC Scheduling and Communication

  • Ongoing modification of classroom and LRC support schedule to meet student needs
  • Development and implementation of toileting schedule using a private bathroom with changing table
  • Frequent parent communications by email, in person, and on Zoom
  • Collaboration with school-wide staff regarding support plans for individual students (particularly important for specialists)
  • Monitoring on playground and lunchroom
  • Additional support during specialists to allow students to access curriculum

Classroom Modifications and Accommodations

  • LRC teachers and paraprofessionals are pushing into general education classrooms for support in reading, writing, math, behavior support, and social skills at all grade levels
  • Small, heterogeneous groups have been implemented to support not only LRC alongside general education students
  • Teaching of general education curriculum content multiple times per week to assist with processing
  • Implementation of visual schedules within general education classroom to aid with transitions
  • Provision of timers for general education classrooms to aid in transitions as well as a visual representation for students for personal breaks and pull-out instruction
  • Implementation of a 3-drawer system for LRC students when working independently (general education assignments not completed are placed in drawer 1). During independent time, students retrieve these materials and work on them. Once Drawer 1 work is complete, the student continues with drawer 2 work (which is also academic, but less demanding). When drawer 2 work is complete, the student may engage in activities from drawer 3 (typically preferred activities or puzzles that the child enjoys)
  • Implementation of Check-In-Check-Out for students as needed
  • Testing accommodations (students test one-on-one with LRC teacher in LRC room)

Multilingual Student Supports

  • Foster communication between classroom and ML teachers
  • Support ML/gen ed partnership through weekly check-ins which allow ML staff to identify how to support the students as well as the teachers on an ongoing basis
  • Provide in-class presence by ML staff to support instruction as it occurs with regards to language skills needed to access the academic content
     

Intended Impacts

  • Prepare students for next grade level expectations and independent functioning within a general education classroom
  • Building a sense of community within both the general education classroom and the LRC classroom so that students are comfortable and ready to engage in both environments

Key Data

  • ABC data (identifying the Antecedent, Behavior, and Consequence)
  • Weekly IEP goal data collection
  • i-Ready and Benchmark Advance Data
  • Informal observations
     

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Increase Diversity of Parent Leadership

  • We have expanded the diversity of our PTSA leadership to better reflect our community (5 ethnicities now represented by male and female board members)
  • We worked to recruit an increasingly diverse parent group for our Site Council representatives (currently five ethnicities including a grandparent, male, and female representatives)

Increase Staff Diversity to Better Represent our Population

  • Continuing to build upon the diversity of our certificated staff (5 of our hires within the past two years represent ethnicities from our community other than white)
  • Increased diversity amongst paraprofessionals through hiring practices (currently over half of our para team represent diverse ethnicities)

Providing Supports for Engagement

  • Parent volunteers currently available for translating in 4 languages as needed
  • Promoting use of family support liaison throughout school community
  • School Counselor reaching out to support students and families in need, including our 7 McKinney-Vento students
  • Creation and use of PTSA Angel Program to provide support for items needed by families experiencing financial challenges (20.57% of our students currently qualify for free and reduced lunch)
  • Dean of Students developing relationships and partnering closely with families experiencing challenges getting students to attend school

Outreach Activities/Events

  • Celebration of Learning evening event (families invited to visit campus, check out classrooms, see samples of their child’s work, and enjoy a free pizza dinner)
  • ML Family Night (families of students receiving ML services invited to meet with our ML staff and learn about services available to their children)
  • Multi-Cultural Night (families from diverse ethnic backgrounds and experiences provide games, activities, food samples, and information using booths set up throughout our commons and gymnasium. Dance and musical performances serve as a centerpiece to the evening)
  • Change to PTSA School Auction (this event, which historically was exorbitantly expensive has been relocated from the Hyatt to Pickering Barn, with a simplified western theme and much lower entry point for families desiring to participate.)

Intended Impacts

  • Increase engagement by a broad spectrum of diverse families
  • Provide inclusive and inviting environment and opportunities for family members

Key Data

  • Attendance
  • Participation of Title/LAP students at Celebration of Learning
     
  • Diverse representation amongst PTSA leadership and Site Council members

Technology Integration

Personalized Learning 
Teachers use district technology tools such as Seesaw, Book Creator, Microsoft tools, and Canva to present content in multiple ways and to allow students to demonstrate mastery using multiple means of expression. These adaptive learning platforms enable teachers to utilize Universal Design for Learning principles, which in turn help close gaps for students disproportionately impacted by one-size-fits-all instruction. 
 
Access to Resources 
Teachers use tech tools to provide widespread access to learning materials, including standards-aligned online lessons via Zearn, Benchmark, Amplify, or i-Ready, e-books via Learning Ally or Sora, or age-appropriate digital research databases such as PebbleGo or World Book Online. Access to these resources continues outside the school day, removing barriers for families and allowing students opportunities for additional review and practice of new skills and concepts. 

Assistive Technologies 
Teachers use tools like speech-to-text, screen readers, and customizable user interfaces help students with disabilities or language barriers to fully participate in learning, promoting inclusivity and equity. 
 
Project-Based and Creative Tools  
Newcastle teachers utilize multimedia creation tools (Seesaw, Book Creator, Canva, Microsoft tools), coding environments (BrainPop coding, code.org), and collaborative software (Microsoft Teams, Book Creator) to give students varied ways to express learning. These foster creativity and give students from diverse backgrounds more opportunities to succeed beyond traditional methods. 
 

Intended Impacts 
  • Increase student engagement in learning. 
  • Reduce barriers and provide access to learning. 
 
Key Data 
  • Track data on learning platform/digital tool usage through Clever 
  • i-Ready and Benchmark Assessments to track the impact on student learning 
  • Tracking academic outcomes for students who are using technology as part of a tier 2 intervention 

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

Tod Wood

SIP Team Members

Tod Wood, Principal

Alissa Miller, Kindergarten Teacher

April Jasman, 1st Grade Teacher

Sandy Genereaux, 2nd Grade Teacher

Robyn Lundberg, 3rd Grade Teacher

Julie Howard, 4th Grade Teacher

Taylor Kassuba, 5th Grade Teacher

Priscilla Hooke, Title/LAP

Trisha Snyder, Librarian

Edith Delgado, ML Teacher

Amy Mudrovich, SpEd Teacher

Claire Trowbridge, Dean of Students

Supervisor Review

Melinda Reynvaan, November 15

Site Council or PTSA Review

Site Council Review, October 25

School Board Review

December 3, 2024